Indirect Procurement

Why businesses struggle with indirect procurement

on

Click here to view original web page at info.proximagroup.com


Proxima, in conjunction with NelsonHall, ran a research study (involving 120 FTSE 100 CFOs and CPOs from UK, Europe and North America) to investigate the perceptions, attitudes and desired outcomes of Indirect Procurement to catalyse a common sense that procurement could and should play a greater role in most businesses.

Some of the responses in our study do indicate that indirect procurement in some organisations is perceived to have a role that is somewhat tactical and administrative. Some respondents advised that it can create process blocks and can, on occasion, even be antagonistic to specialist suppliers of the business, particularly specialist service providers. 

Our first whitepaper, in this series of three, closely examined the quantitative research data surrounding the current perceptions of the indirect procurement function. This whitepaper examines the qualitative data gathered throughout the research and explores why many businesses fail to drive maximum benefits out of their indirect spend and recommendations for effectively managing indirect costs.

Highlights from the Whitepaper

  • 57% of CFOs expressed low levels of satisfaction with the cost effectiveness of the indirect procurement function
  • 58% of CFOs expressed low satisfaction with the proportion of indirect spend under management
  • Indirect procurement at a strategic level is political not tactical

About Editorial Team

Editorial Team

The SupplyChains Magazine editorial team takes great pride in bringing you the best information to help you succeed in your supply chain, logistics or procurement functions. Together, our editors and contributors have more than 50 years of supply chain industry knowledge to share with you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *